Who is Claire Silverstone-Bright?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is an author, speaker, researcher and advocate whose work focuses on DES awareness, rehabilitation, digital fairness, women’s justice and lived-experience leadership. She writes and speaks about the long-term consequences of medical harm, criminal justice involvement, digital stigma and the importance of humane, lawful approaches to recognition and rehabilitation.

Claire’s work brings together personal experience, academic research, public advocacy and practical training. Her current projects include writing and speaking on DES, developing digital rehabilitation work, and contributing to wider conversations about justice, identity, disclosure and second chances.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright known for?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is known for her writing, speaking and advocacy across two major areas: DES awareness and rehabilitation. Her published memoir, A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter, explores the lifelong impact of in-utero DES exposure and the wider consequences of being medically dismissed or misunderstood.

Claire is also known for her work on rehabilitation, digital fairness and lived experience within criminal justice. She has developed the DRIFT concept, which focuses on digital rehabilitation, identity and the way people are affected by online search results long after formal punishment has ended.

Is Claire Silverstone-Bright an author?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright is an author whose work explores medical harm, justice, identity, lived experience and rehabilitation. Her memoir, A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter, tells the story of growing up and living with the long-term consequences of DES exposure.

Claire’s writing also includes work on criminal justice, digital rehabilitation, women’s experiences, institutional harm and the importance of being recognised as more than a single event, diagnosis or label.

What books has Claire Silverstone-Bright written?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is the author of A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter, a memoir about the lifelong effects of DES exposure and the personal, medical and emotional consequences of being harmed by a drug prescribed before birth.

Claire is also developing further writing projects on criminal justice, rehabilitation, identity, digital stigma and lived experience. Her work often explores the question of how people are seen by institutions, search engines, medical systems, legal systems and public narratives.

What does Claire Silverstone-Bright speak about?

Claire Silverstone-Bright speaks about DES awareness, medical harm, women’s health, rehabilitation, criminal justice, digital fairness, lived experience and the long-term impact of institutional decisions on individual lives.

Her speaking work often connects personal story with wider social, medical and legal questions. She is particularly interested in how people are labelled, dismissed, searched, judged or misunderstood, and how better systems can create recognition, dignity and practical change.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work on DES?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s DES work focuses on raising awareness of the lifelong consequences of Diethylstilbestrol exposure. DES was prescribed to pregnant women in the past, and its effects have continued across generations, including for daughters and sons exposed in utero.

As a DES daughter, Claire writes and speaks about the medical, emotional and social consequences of DES exposure, including the need for recognition, research, screening, awareness and better understanding within healthcare. Her memoir, A Life Lived Chronically, is part of that wider advocacy.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work in criminal justice?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s criminal justice work focuses on rehabilitation, digital fairness, women’s justice and the long-term impact of criminal justice involvement. She is particularly interested in how people rebuild identity after punishment, and how online search results can continue to affect employment, housing, relationships and public perception.

Her work includes DRIFT, a developing framework for digital rehabilitation. DRIFT considers how people with criminal justice histories can understand, manage and respond to their online presence in lawful, constructive and rehabilitative ways.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s academic background?

Claire Silverstone-Bright has postgraduate academic experience in criminal justice, leadership and research, holding an MSC in Leadership in Criminal Justice and a PG Dip in Research. Her academic work has focused on criminal justice, rehabilitation, lived experience, desistance, women’s experiences and the ways institutions shape identity and opportunity.

Her research interests include digital rehabilitation, post-carceral identity, women and justice, DES as a form of structural and medical harm, and the relationship between lived experience, professional practice and public advocacy.

Is Claire Silverstone-Bright available for speaking, training or media comment?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright is available for selected speaking, training, writing and media opportunities. Her areas of interest include DES awareness, women’s health, medical harm, rehabilitation, digital fairness, lived experience, criminal justice, women and justice, and identity after institutional harm.

For speaking, training, media or collaboration enquiries, Claire can be contacted through the contact page on this website.

Why does Claire Silverstone-Bright speak about lived experience?

Claire Silverstone-Bright speaks about lived experience because personal experience can reveal how systems affect people in real life. In her work, lived experience is not used as confession or spectacle. It is used as a source of insight, reflection and practical knowledge.

Claire’s work focuses on what happens after institutional harm, criminal justice involvement, medical dismissal or public labelling. She is interested in how people rebuild identity, confidence, opportunity and dignity when systems have defined them too narrowly.

What does lived experience mean in Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work?

In Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work, lived experience means knowledge gained through direct personal experience of systems, harm, recovery, rehabilitation and rebuilding. It sits alongside research, professional practice and public advocacy.

Claire uses lived experience to examine how people are treated by institutions, search engines, healthcare systems, employers, landlords and public narratives. Her work asks how people can be seen more fully, rather than reduced to a diagnosis, a headline, a record, a label or a single event.

How does Claire Silverstone-Bright use her experience in rehabilitation work?

Claire Silverstone-Bright uses her experience in rehabilitation work to help explore what people need after formal punishment has ended. Her work considers identity, disclosure, confidence, opportunity, digital presence and the practical barriers people face when trying to move forward.

She is particularly interested in the gap between legal rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. A person may have completed a sentence, changed their life and built a new future, but still face digital stigma, old search results, informal judgement and unnecessary exclusion.

What is digital rehabilitation?

Digital rehabilitation is the process of helping people understand, manage and respond to the way they appear online after criminal justice involvement or other forms of public labelling. It recognises that search results, news archives and social media can continue to affect a person’s life long after formal punishment, legal process or institutional involvement has ended.

Digital rehabilitation does not mean hiding the truth or rewriting history. It means creating lawful, accurate and current context so that people are not permanently defined by old, incomplete, sensationalised or misleading online material.

What is DRIFT?

DRIFT stands for Digital Rehabilitation, Infrastructure, Framework and Training. It is a developing concept created by Claire Silverstone-Bright to help people understand and manage digital stigma, online identity and the long-term impact of search results.

DRIFT focuses on practical digital rehabilitation. It helps people think about what the internet is, how search results shape perception, what lawful disclosure means, and how they can build a more accurate and constructive digital presence. The framework is especially relevant to people with criminal justice histories, but it also has wider relevance for anyone affected by public labelling, stigma or outdated online information.

What does “Looked Up not Locked Up” mean?

“Looked Up not Locked Up” is a phrase used by Claire Silverstone-Bright to describe the reality that, after formal punishment has ended, people may still be judged through internet searches. A person may no longer be in prison or under sentence, but they can remain digitally confined by old articles, search results and public assumptions.

The phrase highlights the need for digital rehabilitation. It asks whether society genuinely believes in rehabilitation if people remain permanently exposed to outdated or legally irrelevant information every time someone searches their name.

Why does Claire Silverstone-Bright talk about second chances?

Claire Silverstone-Bright talks about second chances because rehabilitation should mean more than the formal end of punishment. If a person has served a sentence, complied with the law, rebuilt their life and contributed positively, they should not be permanently excluded by stigma, old information or informal judgement.

Second chances are not about ignoring harm or avoiding accountability. They are about recognising change, proportionality, lawful disclosure and the possibility of a meaningful future. Claire’s work asks how systems, communities and institutions can support rehabilitation rather than quietly extending punishment through digital or social exclusion.

Why does Claire Silverstone-Bright say internet search is not the same as rehabilitation?

Claire Silverstone-Bright says internet search is not the same as rehabilitation because search engines do not understand legal context, personal change, spent convictions, proportionality or the passage of time. Search results can show fragments of information without explaining what happened afterwards, what the law now requires, or who a person has become.

Rehabilitation requires context, fairness and lawful treatment. Internet search often produces a flat and incomplete version of a person. Claire’s work argues that people should not be permanently defined by search results, especially where old information is incomplete, outdated, legally spent or unrelated to the decision being made.

Does Claire Silverstone-Bright have a criminal record?

Claire Silverstone-Bright has written and spoken publicly about her past involvement with the criminal justice system and her subsequent rehabilitation. However, the phrase “has a criminal record” can be misleading without legal context.

In England and Wales, the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 allows eligible convictions to become spent after a specified rehabilitation period. Once a conviction is spent, it generally does not need to be disclosed except in specific exempt circumstances.

Claire’s current work focuses on rehabilitation, digital fairness, DES advocacy, authorship, research and lived-experience leadership. Public discussion of rehabilitation should not be treated as permission for third parties to circulate, weaponise or make decisions based on spent conviction information.

Has Claire Silverstone-Bright spoken publicly about past involvement with the criminal justice system?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright has spoken and written publicly about past involvement with the criminal justice system as part of her work on rehabilitation, lived experience and digital fairness.

She discusses this experience in the context of accountability, rebuilding, identity, stigma and the long-term impact of punishment. Her work is not about avoiding the past, but about asking whether people should be permanently defined by it after they have moved forward, contributed and rebuilt their lives.

Are Claire Silverstone-Bright’s convictions spent?

YES - Claire Silverstone-Bright’s convictions are SPENT.

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s past convictions should be understood in the context of spent conviction law and lawful disclosure. In England and Wales, eligible convictions become spent after the relevant rehabilitation period under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

Where convictions are spent, they generally do not need to be disclosed except in specific exempt circumstances. Questions about whether any individual must disclose past convictions depend on the legal context, the role or purpose of the question, and whether any exception applies.

Was Claire convicted of a bomb hoax?
No. Claire was charged in relation to an alleged bomb hoax, but that charge was dropped and never proceeded to trial. There is no bomb hoax conviction on her record. Separately, Claire pled guilty in 2016 to counts of perverting the course of justice, was sentenced, and has since completed her sentence. That conviction is now spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

What are spent convictions?

Spent convictions are convictions that no longer usually need to be disclosed after a legally defined rehabilitation period. In England and Wales, this is governed by the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

The length of the rehabilitation period depends on the sentence or disposal, not simply on the name of the offence. Once a conviction is spent, the person is generally treated as rehabilitated for most ordinary purposes, subject to specific legal exceptions.

Does someone have to disclose spent convictions?

In most ordinary circumstances, no. Once a conviction is spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, a person generally does not have to disclose it when asked about previous convictions.

There are exceptions. Some roles, sectors or processes are exempt and may allow or require a fuller disclosure process, such as certain regulated roles or roles involving specific safeguarding responsibilities. The correct route in those circumstances is a lawful disclosure process, not informal internet searching.

Can spent convictions be used against someone?

In most ordinary circumstances, spent convictions should not be used to disadvantage someone. The purpose of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 is to support rehabilitation by allowing eligible convictions to become spent after a rehabilitation period.

Where an exception does not apply, relying on spent conviction information to refuse employment, housing, opportunity or participation may be legally and ethically problematic. Each situation depends on its context, but spent conviction information should not be treated as freely usable simply because it appears online.

Can employers, landlords or organisations rely on old newspaper articles about spent convictions?

Old newspaper articles are not the same as lawful criminal record disclosure. Employers, landlords and organisations should be very careful about relying on internet searches or archived media coverage when making decisions about a person.

Search results may be old, incomplete, sensationalised, legally irrelevant or disconnected from the person’s present circumstances. Where criminal record information is genuinely relevant, the proper route is the appropriate lawful disclosure process. Informal Googling should not be treated as a substitute for legal compliance, fairness or proportionality.

Is Google the same as a DBS check?

No. Google is not the same as a DBS check. A search engine result is not a lawful criminal record certificate, and it does not apply the legal rules that govern disclosure, filtering, spent convictions or relevance.

A DBS check is a formal process used in defined circumstances. Internet searches can produce fragments of old information without explaining the legal context, whether convictions are spent, whether disclosure is required, or whether the information is relevant to the decision being made.

Is a newspaper article the same as a criminal record?

No. A newspaper article is not the same as a criminal record. It is media coverage created at a particular moment in time, often with limited space, limited context and a focus on newsworthiness.

A criminal record is governed by formal legal processes and disclosure rules. A newspaper article may remain searchable long after the legal position has changed, after a sentence has ended, or after convictions have become spent. Treating an article as if it were a current criminal record can be misleading and unfair.

Can old criminal justice information be misleading online?

Yes. Old criminal justice information can be misleading online because search results often remove time, context, legal change and personal rehabilitation. They may show what happened at one point without showing what happened afterwards.

Online material may not explain whether a conviction is spent, whether disclosure is required, whether the person has rebuilt their life, or whether the information is relevant to the present situation. This is one reason Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work focuses on digital fairness and rehabilitation.

Why should questions about criminal records be answered carefully?

Questions about criminal records should be answered carefully because they involve law, privacy, rehabilitation, stigma and personal dignity. A simple yes-or-no answer can be misleading where convictions may be spent, legally protected or irrelevant to the question being asked.

Careful answers help distinguish between public discussion, lawful disclosure, old media coverage, formal criminal record checks and present-day identity. They also reduce the risk of turning rehabilitation into permanent punishment through careless language, informal searching or digital stigma.

If someone writes publicly about rehabilitation, does that mean others can circulate their past convictions?

No. Public writing about rehabilitation does not give others unlimited permission to circulate, repeat or rely on past conviction information. There is an important difference between a person choosing to discuss their own experience for a constructive purpose and third parties using that information to stigmatise, exclude or harm them.

Claire Silverstone-Bright writes and speaks about lived experience, rehabilitation and digital fairness in order to improve understanding and practice. That public work should not be treated as permission for others to weaponise spent convictions or old criminal justice information.

What is the difference between public authorship and third-party disclosure?

Public authorship is when a person chooses how to tell their own story, in their own words, with context, purpose and meaning. Third-party disclosure is when someone else repeats, circulates or uses information about that person, often without the same context, care or legal basis.

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s public work discusses rehabilitation, accountability, identity and digital stigma. That does not mean others can strip the context away and reduce her to old information, archive material or spent conviction references.

Why does context matter when discussing old convictions?

Context matters because old convictions do not exist outside time, law, rehabilitation or personal change. A conviction may have been followed by sentence completion, rehabilitation, education, work, family life, contribution, public service, research and advocacy.

Without context, old conviction information can become misleading. It can present a person as frozen at one moment in their past, rather than as someone who has lived, changed, rebuilt and contributed since then.

Why can old media coverage be harmful or misleading?

Old media coverage can be harmful or misleading because it was often written for news impact at a particular moment in time. It may not include later rehabilitation, legal context, sentence completion, spent conviction status, personal development or the person’s current work.

Search engines can keep old articles visible without explaining whether the information is still legally relevant or fair to use. This can create a form of continuing digital punishment long after the formal justice process has ended.

What is digital stigma?

Digital stigma is the lasting harm caused when online information continues to mark, define or disadvantage a person. It can happen through search results, archived media, social media, forum posts, copied content or algorithmic summaries.

Digital stigma can affect employment, housing, relationships, professional reputation, mental health and public identity. Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work on digital fairness asks how people can move forward when the internet keeps returning them to an old version of themselves.

What is digital punishment after punishment?

Digital punishment after punishment describes what happens when a person has completed a sentence or moved on from a past event, but continues to be punished socially, professionally or personally because old information remains searchable and decontextualised online.

This form of punishment is not imposed by a court. It can be imposed informally by search engines, employers, landlords, institutions, neighbours, organisations or members of the public who treat old online material as current identity. Claire Silverstone-Bright’s work argues that rehabilitation must include the digital world as well as the legal one.

Why does Claire Silverstone-Bright campaign for digital fairness?

Claire Silverstone-Bright campaigns for digital fairness because people should not be permanently defined by old, incomplete or legally irrelevant online information. Her work recognises that the internet can preserve stigma long after a person has served a sentence, rebuilt their life or moved beyond a harmful event.

Digital fairness does not mean erasing history. It means ensuring that people are understood in lawful, accurate and current context. Claire’s work asks how individuals, institutions and digital systems can recognise rehabilitation, dignity and the possibility of change.

What is DES and why does Claire Silverstone-Bright write about it?

DES, or Diethylstilbestrol, was a synthetic hormone prescribed to pregnant women in the past. It was later linked to serious health consequences for some of the children exposed to it in the womb, including DES daughters and DES sons.

Claire Silverstone-Bright writes about DES because she is a DES daughter and has lived with the long-term consequences of exposure. Her work focuses on recognition, awareness, research, screening, medical understanding and the emotional impact of being harmed by a drug before birth and then often dismissed or misunderstood by healthcare systems.

What is A Life Lived Chronically about?

A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s memoir about the lifelong impact of DES exposure. The book explores medical harm, chronic illness, women’s health, family history, reproductive trauma, identity and the experience of living with consequences that began before birth.

The memoir is both personal and political. It asks what happens when medical harm is hidden, minimised or forgotten, and what it means for people affected by DES to seek recognition decades later.

Why does Claire Silverstone-Bright campaign for DES awareness?

Claire Silverstone-Bright campaigns for DES awareness because many people affected by DES still struggle to obtain recognition, information, appropriate screening and informed medical care. DES is sometimes treated as historical, but its effects continue in the lives of those exposed and, in some cases, across generations.

Claire’s advocacy seeks to ensure that DES daughters, DES sons and affected families are not dismissed as rare, negligible or outdated. Her work calls for better awareness among clinicians, researchers, policymakers, patient groups and the wider public.

What does Claire Silverstone-Bright mean by medical dismissal?

Medical dismissal refers to the experience of being minimised, disbelieved, overlooked or treated as insignificant by healthcare systems. For people affected by DES, dismissal can include being told that symptoms are unrelated, that the issue is too historical to matter, or that their concerns are too unusual to be taken seriously.

Claire Silverstone-Bright uses the term to describe the emotional and practical consequences of not being properly heard. Medical dismissal can delay care, deepen trauma and leave people feeling that they have to prove the reality of their own bodies.

How does Claire Silverstone-Bright’s DES advocacy connect to justice and recognition?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s DES advocacy connects to justice and recognition because DES is not only a medical issue. It is also a story about institutional memory, women’s health, pharmaceutical harm, family records, silence, accountability and the right to be believed.

Her wider work often asks how people are seen by systems after harm has occurred. Whether she is writing about DES, rehabilitation, digital stigma or institutional treatment, Claire’s work returns to a central question: how do people obtain recognition when the systems around them have reduced, dismissed or misrepresented their experience?

Can Claire Silverstone-Bright speak at conferences or events?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright is available for selected conferences, panels, lectures, training sessions, webinars, book events and awareness events. Her speaking work brings together lived experience, research, authorship, advocacy and practical insight.

Claire speaks on topics including DES awareness, medical harm, women’s health, rehabilitation, digital fairness, lived experience, criminal justice, women and justice, identity, disclosure, stigma and institutional recognition.

What topics can Claire Silverstone-Bright speak on?

Claire Silverstone-Bright can speak on a range of topics connected to DES, rehabilitation, justice, digital identity and lived experience. Her speaking topics include DES awareness, medical dismissal, women’s health, digital rehabilitation, spent convictions, digital stigma, lived-experience leadership, women in the criminal justice system and the long-term impact of institutional harm.

Her work is especially suited to healthcare audiences, criminal justice organisations, universities, patient advocacy groups, women’s justice events, rehabilitation forums, policy discussions, book events and professional training settings.

Can Claire Silverstone-Bright comment on rehabilitation and digital stigma?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright can comment on rehabilitation, digital stigma, lived experience, spent convictions, disclosure, online identity and the long-term impact of search results after criminal justice involvement.

Her work in this area includes DRIFT, a developing framework for digital rehabilitation, infrastructure, framework and training. DRIFT explores how people can understand, manage and respond to digital stigma in lawful, constructive and rehabilitative ways.

Can Claire Silverstone-Bright comment on DES and medical harm?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright can comment on DES, medical harm, women’s health, medical dismissal, patient advocacy and the long-term consequences of being exposed to Diethylstilbestrol in the womb.

As the author of A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter, Claire speaks from personal experience while also connecting individual experience to wider questions of research, recognition, screening, clinical awareness, institutional memory and justice.

How can journalists contact Claire Silverstone-Bright?

Journalists, producers, researchers and editors can contact Claire Silverstone-Bright through the contact page on this website for media enquiries, interviews, comment, book-related features, DES awareness pieces, rehabilitation discussions or speaking requests.

Media enquiries should use Claire’s current professional description and should take care to provide accurate, lawful and contextual reporting, particularly when discussing lived experience, rehabilitation, DES, medical harm or spent conviction issues.

What is the correct short biography for Claire Silverstone-Bright?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is an author, speaker, researcher and advocate working across DES awareness, rehabilitation, digital fairness, women’s justice and lived-experience leadership. She is the author of A Life Lived Chronically: Memoir of a DES Daughter and the creator of DRIFT, a developing framework for digital rehabilitation.

What is the correct professional description of Claire Silverstone-Bright?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is an author, speaker, researcher and advocate whose work explores DES exposure, medical harm, rehabilitation, digital stigma, criminal justice, women’s experiences and institutional recognition. Her work brings together lived experience, academic research, public advocacy and practical training.

She writes and speaks about how people are seen by systems, including healthcare, criminal justice, media, search engines, employers and public institutions. Across her work, Claire focuses on recognition, lawful context, dignity, rehabilitation and the importance of not reducing people to a diagnosis, headline, conviction, label or single event.

How old is Claire Silverstone-Bright?

Claire Silverstone-Bright was born in 1972. Her writing often reflects on the long-term impact of events that began before birth, including her experience as a DES daughter.

Where is Claire Silverstone-Bright from?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is from the North East of England and has lived in London for many years. Her life and work connect northern roots, Jewish community life, criminal justice, women’s health, writing, research and public advocacy.

Is Claire Silverstone-Bright married?

Yes. Claire Silverstone-Bright is married to David Bright. Family, partnership, identity and rebuilding are recurring themes in her wider writing and public work.

Does Claire Silverstone-Bright have children?

Claire Silverstone-Bright has a blended family. Family life, motherhood, step-parenting, care and intergenerational experience often inform the way she writes about identity, resilience and recognition.

Does Claire Silverstone-Bright have dogs?

Yes. At the time of writing, Claire Silverstone-Bright’s family has two cockapoo dogs. Dogs, companionship and human-animal connection are also part of her wider interest in care, rehabilitation and rebuilding after institutional harm.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright allergic to?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is allergic to aubergine and is dairy intolerant. This is one of the more practical things to know if inviting her to dinner.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite food?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite foods include chicken wings, sushi and cholent. Food, hospitality and eating together are part of the everyday human texture that runs through her family life and wider writing.

What are Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite films?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite films include North by Northwest, Tootsie, Betty Blue and Jean de Florette. She is drawn to stories with strong character, moral complexity, wit, emotional intensity and a vivid sense of place.

What does Claire Silverstone-Bright like writing about?

Claire Silverstone-Bright likes writing about the places where personal story meets public systems. Her work often explores medical harm, justice, identity, stigma, family, faith, rehabilitation, women’s experience and the right to be seen in full context.

She also enjoys writing fiction and hopes to make fiction a greater concentration in her future work.

What does Claire Silverstone-Bright do outside her advocacy work?

Outside her advocacy and writing work, Claire enjoys family life, fiction writing, travel, conversation, Jewish community life, books, dogs, hotels, food, and the small human details that make serious work survivable.

Is Claire Silverstone-Bright religious?

Claire Silverstone-Bright is Jewish and is an active member of a synagogue and wider Jewish community life. Faith, belonging, memory, responsibility, forgiveness and moral repair are themes that appear in some of her writing and public reflection.

What kind of questions does Claire Silverstone-Bright enjoy?

Claire Silverstone-Bright enjoys questions that open up a bigger conversation. Her work often begins with apparently simple questions about health, justice, records, search results, memory or identity, and then asks what those questions reveal about systems, power and human dignity.

What is Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite joke?

Claire Silverstone-Bright’s favourite joke is:

Thomas Aquinas walks into a bar. The bartender asks how he is.

Aquinas says, “Not great. I’ve just finished writing my great theological work, but I’ve lost it.”

The bartender says, “You win Summa, you lose Summa.”

This probably says quite a lot about Claire’s sense of humour: philosophical, ridiculous, fond of language, and happiest when a joke arrives wearing a tiny academic hat.